People fancy vacuuming over manual mopping as these gadgets make one’s life easy peasy.
But still, the war between bagged vacuum versus bagless vacuums has created a stir in the house cleaning department.
So are you a sufferer of bagless or bagged vacuum war? Is your buying decision standing on the answer of which is better bagless or bagged vacuums?
You don’t say, but I know!
I Believe, in a debate of bagged vs. bagless vacuum, the most distinctive point becomes a user requirement, intent, preference, or anything you can name.
Vacuums with bags have been serving the home cleaning industry for ages, and we had also seen our parents in our childhood using this type.
Then, as science and technology poured technological blessings over every industry, we saw another breed that was entirely without disposable bags or canisters but befallen with a small debris container.
This is where things took a conflicting turn, and we are literally seeing people today (still) jumping over the topic to defend their favorite gadget type.
But factually, both are suitable vacuum types in their particular areas. So what are those difference-making areas? Let’s discuss it.
Bagged Vs. Bagless Vacuums: The Fight is Real
- Hygienic and much effective for allergy-affected users.
- Bigger capacity for debris
- HEPA filtration is standard
- Deep cleaning
- Flexible usage and go to unreachable places
- Easy maintenance
- Easier to know when to empty debris container
- No power weakening
Which is better bagless or bagged vacuums?
Typically, you’ll encounter people everywhere advocating bagless and bagged vacuums while pushing the pros and cons of each category.
As we tend to identify which category fits in what type of user requirement, we’ll be mentioning user needs and try to fix a better version against the user requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness and Maintenance:
This is one of the most concerning points of about 90% of consumers.
The prices deviate from model to model, category to category, and brand vs. brand.
Bagless vacuums mostly come a bit more expensive than their counterparts. However, on the maintenance side, bagless variants keep you a bit financially relaxed.
Why am I saying this?
Apart from the disposable bags, the HEPA filter is the standard of Bagged machines. So, here your cost becomes 2x in comparison to non-Hepa filter Bagless vacuum.
Disposable bags and Hepa-filters demand a scheduled replacement depending on the make and model. Like Hepa-filter of Shark varies from 3$ to 36$ and above.
And definitely, its life also shows ups and downs between 3-6-12 months depending on your usage.
The availability and non-availability of HEPA filters influence the cleaning quality, but if you are more bend toward maintenance cost, it’s apparent, Bagless vacuum will suit you more.
Additionally, bagless vacuums are a modernized version of vacuum cleaners that use bags.
Currently, a high number of machines come with wireless or battery options. The battery cost levels the game with bagged vacuum in that case.
In those circumstances, things look more biased towards bagged vacuums.
Performance – A great Battle between the Rivals:
Again, the answer isn’t much candid, and the fight in the performance lead is still worth watching.
If you are looking for deep cleanings like Mid-deep pile rugs and carpets, bagged vacuum cleaners are leading the competition for decades.
On the other hand, Bagless vacuums are used to detect the most unreachable places with a variety of accessories and tools.
While HEPA filters used to be standard in Bagged gadgets since almost their birth, now more and more bagless vacuums are coming with HEPA filters.
Though it isn’t the standard here, the vacuum cleaner with disposable bags works better than bagless variants.
But the story doesn’t end here.
Bagged Vacuums hold a bigger capacity to keep debris, but most models don’t indicate the status of canister capacity during cleaning.
Although newer models are coming with light indicators, like HEPA filters, it isn’t a standard here.
On the other hand, nonetheless, you get a miniature container for debris; the built-in transparent bin empowers you to keep a check on when to empty the waste.
So, counterpoint for bagless vacuums.
One more point to note here strictly, it’s the most common problem with bagged vacuums that the performance and suction become weaker as the bag or canister is getting stuffed with debris.
Then, you have to empty the bag to bring these vacuums back to their absolute power.
This really struggles the users while dealing with bigger or deeper areas.
Bagless vacuums don’t retain such weakening power issues, though the low capacity for bigger areas is still a solicitude.
Consequently, on the performance, too, you have to distinguish which machine will suit your appliance squad better.
Hygiene and Environmentalist; Be Attentive:
Now, as the discussion has just landed on hygiene and environment-friendly topic, let your inner environmentalist ego and hygienic curiosity settle at peace.
Unfortunately, there are lots of cloudy stories and speculation, which need to be bust here.
When it comes to environmental friendliness, bagged vacuums have consistently earned a bad reputation.
This is due to some experts terming debris bags as environmental pollutants due to their lousy biodegradability.
It was somehow true until bagged vacuums came with biodegradable bags that would break down in the land, causing no or slightest threat to the environment.
The story is a bit different here with bagless vacuums, as there is no bag, so there will be no question raised regarding such issue.
However, some vacuums come with plastic HEPA filters, which itself is the stubborn biodegradable substance on the planet earth.
So, in this regard, which is better bagless or bagged vacuums?
Logically, the conclusion is still on a roller coaster ride.
Notwithstanding, Bagged vacuums are having a bit edge or upper hand over their counterpart in terms of hygienic decomposing of debris.
Emptying the canister here is a smoother part, while messy is the trash emptying process with bagless vacuums.
Besides, the disposable bags are air-tight and don’t throw back dust and particles through their exhaust that very much suits the allergic sufferers.
On the other side, it’s still a variation, but bagless vacuums from least to high, throwback debris and dust particles.
And with this, bagless vacuums comprise removable filters that you need to wash and fit back to the device; it asks much involvement of your hands.
This whole activity and throwing back particles welcome a high exposure of allergenic issues to the people with the most sensitive skins or asthma problems.
Thus, you can say Bagged Vacuums earn a big point here.
The Bottom Line – What’s the Breakdown of this Story?
Still, if you ask a clear-cut answer, which is better bagless or bagged Vacuums?
I’ll still say, both types have their pros and cons regardless of how impactful these points are. But which one rightly fits your needs?
You have to do calculated math before jumping into any category.