<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightweight USB Host. Part 1 &#8211; Motivation.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1</link>
	<description>A Solder Joint</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-8590</link>
		<dc:creator>oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-8590</guid>
		<description>MAX3421E has fewer bugs and limitations. Besides, I&#039;m not choosing one over another - I&#039;m working on USB host code for Microchip SIE too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAX3421E has fewer bugs and limitations. Besides, I&#8217;m not choosing one over another &#8211; I&#8217;m working on USB host code for Microchip SIE too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManisB</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-8589</link>
		<dc:creator>ManisB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-8589</guid>
		<description>&quot;Microchip makes several parts with built-in USB serial-interface engine (SIE). There is USB peripheral part or two in PIC18 family...&quot;


Why did you choose the MAX external controller over the built-in Microchip one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microchip makes several parts with built-in USB serial-interface engine (SIE). There is USB peripheral part or two in PIC18 family&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Why did you choose the MAX external controller over the built-in Microchip one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan van Bodegraven</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-3776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan van Bodegraven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-3776</guid>
		<description>Just managed to buy the Circuit Cellar article as a PDF from their site for $3,00....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just managed to buy the Circuit Cellar article as a PDF from their site for $3,00&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-42</guid>
		<description>MAX3421E is full/low speed host; it won&#039;t work at high speed. By spec, high speed USB devices shall be capable to fall back to full speed; you can check if your camera works in this mode by connecting it to the PC via full speed hub.  Since you are transferring single images, you won&#039;t need high speed anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAX3421E is full/low speed host; it won&#8217;t work at high speed. By spec, high speed USB devices shall be capable to fall back to full speed; you can check if your camera works in this mode by connecting it to the PC via full speed hub.  Since you are transferring single images, you won&#8217;t need high speed anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cepin</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Cepin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hello,
Dou you think that this chip can be capable of connect USB 2.0 Hi-speed webcam. Webcam I think use isochronous transfers to send frames to PC...I need connect USB webcam (Logitech C200 ,UVC class) to Texas DSP.I need transfer only one picture...no video stream. And I hope that writing firmware will be easier because webcam is UVC class...? Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
Dou you think that this chip can be capable of connect USB 2.0 Hi-speed webcam. Webcam I think use isochronous transfers to send frames to PC&#8230;I need connect USB webcam (Logitech C200 ,UVC class) to Texas DSP.I need transfer only one picture&#8230;no video stream. And I hope that writing firmware will be easier because webcam is UVC class&#8230;? Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so. The part has been around for quite a while, all bugs are known and documented together with workarounds. My guess for &quot;not recommended&quot; status is that they decided not to fix those bugs and not release the updated version of the part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so. The part has been around for quite a while, all bugs are known and documented together with workarounds. My guess for &#8220;not recommended&#8221; status is that they decided not to fix those bugs and not release the updated version of the part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-40</guid>
		<description>On the MAXIM website page for the MAX3421E, this note is under &quot;Status&quot;:

All versions are Not Recommended for New Designs.

Does this mean there is an issue with this part?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the MAXIM website page for the MAX3421E, this note is under &#8220;Status&#8221;:</p>
<p>All versions are Not Recommended for New Designs.</p>
<p>Does this mean there is an issue with this part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Need help to start with USB &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/lightweight-usb-hostpart-1/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Need help to start with USB &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 23:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.circuitsathome.com/?p=104#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] thanks everyone for your replies.  I am currently looking into MAX3421E and hoping that the guy at http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/pr...usb-hostpart-1 knows what he is doing.  Don mentioned ghielectronics: it&#039;s promising, cheap, 16$, but goes to 70$ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thanks everyone for your replies.  I am currently looking into MAX3421E and hoping that the guy at <a href="http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/pr...usb-hostpart-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.circuitsathome.com/mcu/pr&#8230;usb-hostpart-1</a> knows what he is doing.  Don mentioned ghielectronics: it&#8217;s promising, cheap, 16$, but goes to 70$ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

